Bloggers vs models: it’s becoming a worse rivalry than cats and dogs!
So it seems that the mystery blogger who was harassing Liskula Cohen (rhymes with Dracula) is no longer a mystery. That’s good too since the mystery blogger said lots of bad stuff about Liskula like: she smells bad, is promiscuous, is mental, has cooties in her underpants, and that her name sounds like an Iron Curtain mouthwash from back before the fall of the Berlin Wall (OK I made those last 2 up).
Psychotic is in the eye of the beholder? Here’s looking at you, kid!
Mind you Liskula comes off a little psychotic to me. I’m not saying that she is psychotic, or that she acts psychotic, or has any remotely psychotic. It’s just my subjective impression (now that SkanksInNYC’s cover has got blown we all have to be more careful about what we post, & remember where the line has been drawn, allegedly!).
Speaking out of both sides of her mouth? She doesn’t have a one track mind!
Now why would I get that impression? Maybe it’s all those rapid lane changes her train of thought seems to take. Changes like ‘the blogger is a pathetic girl who has nothing better to do than obsess about me’, but on the other hand ‘why should I let this go?’. Then there’s ‘I’ve forgiven her so that I can get onto the next stage of pursuing legal options against her, maybe’ (I’ve paraphrased these statements). Being able to see both sides of an issue doesn’t make her dishonest.
Model is in a swinging mood – hysterical or just histrionic?
Then there was her crying jag at the end of the interview.Of course being in touch with your meotions doesn’t make you crazy; unless you emotions are of the up & down mood swing variety, or they make you do strange stuff like laugh and cry on national TV in the course of one 10 minute interview, allegedly. In fact I can’t even say that Liskula was crying on camera. There were know tears or sniffles. Maybe she made that face because she was holding back a fart or something. I’m sure that Skankblog’s cruel teasing about her body odor and personal hygiene issues (and we all have them in one form or another) has her a little self conscious about such things.
Rogue celebs are vindicated by the system: the wheel is crooked but it’s the only game in town!
Besides a psychotic skank couldn’t have won a land mark legal case. Well that is unless there were one of those types who use the system or exploit loopholes – generally speaking. Or if they were Paris Hilton. She’s legal Teflon most of the time. Of course some of those famous substances abusing emotional basket cases like Naomi Campbell, Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, etc., seem to routinely get the better of the legal system. I’m not implying that our legal system doesn’t quite know what to do with rogue celebs such as OJ Simpson for instance. You may infer that if you wish to so construe.
The glass is half full
Besides, this verdict is really a win win win scenario:
- Bloggers will probably be a lot more cautious about what we post now. So that’s bound to make our writing a lot more vague and incoherent as we hedge in an attempt to protect ourselves against possible legal retribution from people with nothing better to do than obsesses about what we post (Which wouldn’t make them sad and pathetic or anything). Just like the legitimate mainstream press (By incoherent writing I mean have you read TIME or Newsweek lately? Of course for the sake of precision, and lest those illustrious journals take issue, i should say ‘alleged’ writing. I don’t want to commit myself on that!).
- Liskula also got a lot of attention out of that, which she may or may not enjoy. Before SkanksInNYC no one knew who she was! Now she’s sitting down with Diane Sawyer! I fear that she might be getting even more attention in the near furutre since she doesn’t seem like the type to let things go. Why should she?
- Finally this couldn’t have come at a worse time for Kirstie Alley. She recently tweeted that National Enquirer reporter Sarah Cordes has anal leakage. She has also been leading people to believe that Cordes is the one who wrote her “4 Years To Live” cover story for the NE. Since both claims are unsubstantiated, that might give Cordes a liable case against Alley! Alley isn’t the only celeb to let her fingers to the talking. Verbal diarrhea is an epidemic on Twitter (and reaching global pandemic proportions fast!), though I can’t say whether celebs are generally afflicted by anal leakage or not! So this new litigious attitude engendered by Ms. Cohen could become an alleged double edged sword! Like Liskula herself says “why should anyone let this kind of thing go?”
The National Enquirer is half baked. Kirstie Alley goes off half cocked!



Now Kirstie Alley admits to not doing any kind of fact check on the stuff she posts (which even the NE would do, or might do, allegedly. I want o be careful about committing myself to any of these statements). Whether or not Cordes & co have a basis for a libel suite, there might be clear grounds here for a harassment case!
August 21, 2009
Categories: Uncategorized . . Author: AgentOrange . Comments: Leave a comment